𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Interpretability, validity, and the minimum important difference

✍ Scribed by Leah McClimans

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
172 KB
Volume
32
Category
Article
ISSN
1573-1200

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Examining the minimum important differen
Examining the minimum important difference
✍ Rollin Brant; Lloyd Sutherland; Robert Hilsden πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 97 KB

The increasing use of constructed scales and indices in clinical science has preceded in many cases a clear understanding of how to appraise the importance of the di erences or changes that are thereby observed. For example, in the design of clinical trials which employ such scales as outcome measur

Determining the minimum clinically impor
Determining the minimum clinically important differences for outcomes in the DOMINO trial
✍ Robert Howard; Patrick Phillips; Tony Johnson; John O'Brien; Bart Sheehan; James πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 104 KB

## Abstract ## Background Although less likely to be reported in clinical trials than expressions of the statistical significance of differences in outcomes, whether or not a treatment has delivered a specified minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is also relevant to patients and their c

Determination of the longitudinal validi
Determination of the longitudinal validity and minimally important difference of the 8-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)
✍ Nan Luo; Louis C.S. Tan; Yingjiao Zhao; Puay-Ngoh Lau; Wing-Lok Au; Shu Chuen Li πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 64 KB

## Abstract The aim of our study was to assess the longitudinal validity of the 8‐item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ‐8) in terms of responsiveness and test–retest reliability and to determine the minimally important difference (MID) for PDQ‐8 using the anchor‐based approach in Asians with