Objective. To establish the responsiveness of observational and self-report methods for the assessment of disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods. Data from 186 patients with hip OA or knee OA were used. Data from 1 observational method and 4 self-report methods for the
Internal consistency and validity of an observational method for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis
โ Scribed by Steultjens, M. P. M. ;Dekker, J. ;van Baar, M. E. ;Oostendorp, R. A. B. ;Bijlsma, J. W. J.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 141 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0004-3591
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Objective:
To establish the internal consistency and validity of an observational method for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis (oa).
Methods:
Data were obtained from 198 patients with oa of the hip or knee. results of the observational method were compared with results of self-report methods (questionnaires) on disability in mobility.
Results:
Both cronbach's alpha and mokken scale analysis indicate that the method is internally consistent. using factor analysis, observed and self-reported disability in mobility were found to be closely associated and could not be differentiated.
Conclusions:
The observational method is internally consistent and indeed measures disability in mobility (high convergent validity), but observations and self-report seem to yield largely equivalent information (low divergent validity). this raises questions regarding the simultaneous use of both observational and self-report methods in the assessment of disability in mobility in oa patients.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES