𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Intermolecular interactions by perturbation theory including exchange effects

✍ Scribed by A. Van der Avoird


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1967
Tongue
English
Weight
276 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-2614

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A perlurbnlion

theory for intcrmolccular interactions is dcvcIc+! with wave functions of arbitrary symmetry. Firsl-nnd second-order expressions are lvritten out. For the sake of simplicity in practical calculntions.

Lhc Unsiild npproximntion is introduced in the second-order cncrgy.

i. INTRODUCTION

Ikermolecular and interatomic 1:lteraction.s are usually distinguiskd in two types: At small distances the "chemical" interactions are importa!?!. They are calculated i? first-order perturbation theory, taking the Pauli exclusion principle into account by using properl, antisymmetrized wave functions (e. g. Heitler-London).

At distances large compared to the molecular, atomic diameters these inicractions are negligibly small compared to the, "physicai', Van der Waals interactions. The latter are calculated in second-order perturbation theory with wave functions that are simple products of molecular, atomic wave functions.

Since both types of interactions are of quantum theoretical nature this distinction has LO be justified an& it will certainly not be valid for intermedist'e @stances.

The firs! to develop a perturbation theory for inttzratomic interactions with antisymmetric wave fLr;ctions were Eiserzchitz and London [l]. After them scch a perturbation theory or-a variational procedure that is quite similar to it was used by Margenau [2], Moffitt [3], McGinnies and Jansen [a], Dalgarno and Lynn [5], Hirschfelder and Silbey [G]. We thizk that the treatment of Eisenschitz an:! London is so complete and mathematically elegant that it deserves to be written out in a'more modern, somewhat generalized language.

There are two basic diffevences that distkguish this perturbation theory :vith antisymmetric wave functions from the usual per!crbntion theory. The unperturbed Hamiltonian, If,, is a sum of * On leave of absence from 'Jnilever Research Lnboratories, Vlaardingen,


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Intermolecular perturbation theory: Reno
✍ William H. Adams πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 993 KB

For intermolecular perturbation theories in which it is assumed that the unperturbed wave function of the composite system is a product of the unperturbed wave functions of its components, and which satisfy one general constraint, we derive two renormalized interaction energy expressions which are m

Approximate exchange perturbation study
✍ W. Andrzej Sokalski; Henryk Chojnacki πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1978 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 647 KB

## Abstract In an attempt to rationalize and improve an approximate exchange perturbation scheme related to the model of Murrell et al., more accurate approximations are introduced eliminating the use of empirical parameters. The total interaction energy has been evaluated as the sum of additive el

Second-order BSSE-free perturbation theo
✍ J. Noga; Á. VibΓ³k πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 445 KB

BSSE-free second-order perturbation theory is developed and implemented within the supermolecular approach of intermolecular energy calculations. The theory is based upon the chemical Hamiltonian approach. Model calculations are reported for He2 and ( HF)2. The method should be a better alternative