Living donor liver transplantation is now a common practice in countries in which the availability of cadaveric organs is limited. The preoperative preparation, intraoperative surgical technique, and postoperative care of donors and recipients have evolved in recent years. We retrospectively compare
Intermittent inflow occlusion in living liver donors: Impact on safety and remnant function
โ Scribed by Charles M. Miller; Michele Masetti; Nicola Cautero; Fabrizio DiBenedetto; Augusto Lauro; Antonio Romano; Cristiano Quintini; Antonio Siniscalchi; Bruno Begliomini; Antonio D. Pinna
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 68 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.20071
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Clamping of the portal triad accomplishes complete inflow occlusion. This maneuver is commonly used during liver surgery to minimize blood loss but is not widely used in living donors undergoing resection for liver transplantation. We compared outcomes in living donors who underwent resection with and without inflow occlusion. We reviewed data on 2 nonsimultaneous living liver donor cohorts. The first 20 donors (group 1) underwent resection without inflow occlusion. In the next 15 donors (group 2), inflow occlusion was used during parenchymal transection, using cycles of 10 -15 minutes occlusion and 6 minutes reperfusion. In donors, we recorded type of resection; ischemia times; blood loss; transfusions; peak ALT, AST, bilirubin, and INR in the first 5 days; hospital length of stay (LOS), and major complications. In recipients, we recorded peak ALT. In group 1, 19 of 20 donors underwent right hepatectomy. In group 2, 8 donors underwent right hepatectomy, and 7 donors had left lobectomies. Total ischemic time ranged from 16 -49 minutes (mean, 31 ุ 9 minutes). In group 1, two donors received a total of 5 U of allogeneic blood. In group 2, no donor required transfusion. Mean peak ALT was significantly higher in group 1 (521 ุ 336 U/L) than group 2 (322 ุ 162 U/L; P โซุโฌ 0.03). Mean INR was significantly higher in group 1 (1.8 ุ 0.2) vs. group 2 (1.5 ุ 0.2; P โซุโฌ 0.001). There were 4 major complications in group 1 (incisional hernia, transient liver failure, biliary stricture, and biliary leak) and no major intraoperative or postoperative complications in group 2. Mean LOS was significantly longer in group 1 (7.9 ุ 2.9 days) than group 2 (6.2 ุ 1.1 days; P โซุโฌ 0.04). Mean peak ALT in recipients trended lower in group 2. In conclusion, inflow occlusion was associated with reduced blood loss and less ischemic injury to hepatic remnants in the donors and the grafts in the recipients. These benefits were associated with a diminished incidence of major complications and shorter LOS. Inflow occlusion should be an essential part of living donor hepatectomy. (
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of portal hemodynamics on indices of liver function and graft regeneration in patients after adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (R-LDLT). Sixty-four patients who underwent R-LDLT and had an uneventful postoperative course were enroll
The use of epidural catheters has been a subject of active debate in living liver donors because of the possible postoperative coagulation derangement and the subsequent risk of epidural hematoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of epidural catheters in relation to the changes in co