Intermediate biomarkers of precancer and their application in chemoprevention

✍ Scribed by Gary J. Kelloff; Winfred F. Malone; Charles W. Boone; Vernon E. Steele; Linda A. Doody

• Book ID: 102879834
• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 1992
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 563 KB
• Volume: 50
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0730-2312
• DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240501103

✦ Synopsis

The Chemoprevention Branch of the National Cancer Institute has established a program for the development of safe and effective cancer chemopreventive agents. This program includes identification of new agents, testing for efficacy in vitro and in animafs, studies in animals to model clinical use, and preclinical toxicity and metabolism evaluation. Ultimately, the most promising agents progress to clinical trials. The long period required for cancer onset presents a significant challenge to the design of clinical trialsfor chemoprevention. Phase Ill trials in which cancer reduction is the endpoint require large subject groups (tens of thousands) and follow-up duration of more than five years. Because of these requirements, the costs of such trials are high. The Chemoprevention Branch is addressing this challenge by expansion of the preclinical and Phase II clinical efficacy efforts to include intermediate biomarkers of carcinogenesis as study endpoints.

The Chemoprevention Branch's studies focus on the development of biomarkers with high reliability and predictive value for cancer. Both single markers and batteries of complementary and parallel markers are evaluated. Among the criteria for biomarkers for chemoprevention studies are the following: (1) differential expression in normal and high risk tissue, (2) appearance early in carcinogenesis (the earlier a reliable biornarker appears, the greater is the chance for successful intervention with a chemopreventive agent), (3) high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy relative to cancer, (4) ease of measurement (use of non-invasive techniques and small tissue samples is preferable), (5) demonstration of modulation by chemopreventive agents, and (6) correlation of modulation with decreased cancer incidence.