✦ LIBER ✦

Interfacial Mass Transfer in the Liquid–Gas System: An Optical Study

✍ Scribed by A. M. Kutepov; B. G. Pokusaev; D. A. Kazenin; S. P. Karlov; A. V. Vyaz'min

Book ID: 110291156
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 141 KB
Volume: 35
Category: Article
ISSN: 0040-5795
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010409322333

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Mass Transfer Characteristics in Gas-liq

Mass Transfer Characteristics in Gas-liquid-liquid System

✍ Arunabha Kundu; Eric Dumont; Anne-Marie Duquenne; Henri Delmas 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 584 KB

Transport of mass in ternary liquid-liqu

Transport of mass in ternary liquid-liquid systems. Part II. Mass transfer and interfacial studies

✍ Anil Sethy; Harry T. Cullinan Jr. 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 809 KB

The determination of mass transfer coeff

The determination of mass transfer coefficients and interfacial areas in gas-liquid contacting systems

✍ G. B. Dillon; I. J. Harris 📂 Article 📅 1966 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 532 KB

Coupling of heat and mass transfer fluxe

Coupling of heat and mass transfer fluxes in interfacial mass transfer in liquid-liquid systems

✍ G.A. Davies; J.D. Thornton 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 175 KB

Interfacial area and mass transfer coeff

Interfacial area and mass transfer coefficients in liquid-gas ejectors

✍ A. Arunagiri; I. Regupathi; T. Murugesan 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 344 KB

Mass transfer in cocurrent gas-liquid fl

Mass transfer in cocurrent gas-liquid flow: Gas side mass transfer coefficients in upflow, interfacial areas and mass transfer coefficient in gas and liquid in downflow

✍ R.V. Shilimkan; J.B. Stepanek 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 648 KB

comparison of the values of mterfaclal area m cocurrent downward flow of gas and hquld with those obtamed m upward flow revealed very httle difference Volumetric as well as true hqmd side mass transfer coefficients m downflow were found to be several times lower than m upflow Only m the smallest 10