𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Intercomparison of evapotranspiration estimates

✍ Scribed by MOHAN, S.

Book ID
127036671
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Group
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
959 KB
Volume
36
Category
Article
ISSN
0262-6667

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Remote estimation of regional evapotrans
Remote estimation of regional evapotranspiration
✍ Fuqin Li; T.J. Lyons πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 210 KB

Three models are applied to estimating evapotranspiration in central Australia, using limited routine meteorological data and the NOAA-14 AVHRR overpass. By minimizing the difference between model predicted surface temperature and satellite derived temperature to adjust the estimated soil moisture,

Estimation of FAO Evapotranspiration Coe
Estimation of FAO Evapotranspiration Coefficients
✍ Frevert, Donald K.; Hill, Robert W.; Braaten, Bruce C. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› American Society of Civil Engineers 🌐 English βš– 333 KB
Hydroinformatics in evapotranspiration e
Hydroinformatics in evapotranspiration estimation
✍ S. Naoum; I.K. Tsanis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 856 KB

The design, development, and application of a hydroinformatic system for estimating evapotranspiration is presented. Reference evapotranspiration is calculated via the Penman-Monteith approach as well as the Class A pan evaporation records. Station-and grid-based methods for estimating reference eva

Thermodynamic consistency of potential e
Thermodynamic consistency of potential evapotranspiration estimates in Florida
✍ David A. Chin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 593 KB

## Abstract This study investigates the validity of fundamental assumptions regarding the partitioning of energy that are implicit in the Penman–Monteith (PM) and Priestly–Taylor (PT) models of potential evapotranspiration (PET). Both these models require energy conservation, but differ in the part