Intentional control over prejudice: when the choice of the measure matters
β Scribed by Francesca M. Franco; Anne Maass
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 144 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We tested the idea that the correlation between implicit and explicit measures of prejudice depends on whether or not groups are normatively protected against discrimination. A pilot study (N 31) showed that 13 categories varied widely in the degree to which it is acceptable to express negative opinions about them. The main study involving 89 Catholic subjects found that explicit (reward allocation, liking ratings) and implicit measures (linguistic intergroup bias) of prejudice were correlated for the outgroup that is not normatively protected against discrimination (Islamic Fundamentalists) but uncorrelated for the outgroup that is protected (Jews).
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## ABSTRACT Recent literature in performance evaluation has focused on preferences and characteristics of returns' distribution that go beyond mean and variance world. However, Eling (2008) compared the Sharpe ratio with some of these performance measures, and found virtually identical rank orderin