In this article, we provide a partial answer to the question "How can engineering
Integration of academic and occupational curricula in science and technology education
β Scribed by P. James Gaskell; Gary Hepburn
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 80 KB
- Volume
- 81
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0097-0352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This article analyzes a current example of the integration of academic and occupational curriculum in science and technology education in light of issues developed in two historical failures. The issues discussed are the differential status of academic and applied science, the importance of support from groups such as industry and postsecondary institutions, the lack of consensus over the intended clientele and purpose of the program, and the role of subject matter communities. In terms of Dewey's distinction between an education for occupations and an education through occupations, none of the three cases reviewed was directed at providing specific workplace skills for students. Possibilities for providing a broader education in science through occupations may be improved with changing economic contexts.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A conceptual framework of positions on women in science, engineering, and technology (SET) was developed, showing a chronological progression of the main approaches to women's underrepresentation in SET during the past 20 years. Numerous initiatives have been advocated to address women's underrepres
Science education reformers have argued that presenting science in the abstract is neither motivating nor inclusive of the majority of students. Science-technology-society (STS) curricula that give science an accessible social context have developed in response, but controversy surrounds the extent
Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology
Moore's (1) editorial in the September 2009 issue of Bioessays has very appropriately drawn attention to the serious issue of ''how insufficient study of methods confounds the study of biology itself.'' Researches in the so-called ''modern biology'' are acutely suffering from this syndrome. With inc