We analyze canonical operator space structures on the non-commutative L p spaces L p ' (M; ., |) constructed by interpolation a la Stein Weiss based on two normal semifinite faithful weights ., | on a W\*-algebra M. We show that there is only one canonical (i.e. arising by interpolation) operator sp
Integral Non-commutative Spaces
β Scribed by S. Paul Smith
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 163 KB
- Volume
- 246
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-8693
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
A non-commutative space X is a Grothendieck category Mod X. We say X is integral if there is an indecomposable injective X-module X such that its endomorphism ring is a division ring and every X-module is a subquotient of a direct sum of copies of X . A noetherian scheme is integral in this sense if and only if it is integral in the usual sense. We show that several classes of non-commutative spaces are integral. We also define the function field and generic point of an integral space and show that these notions behave as one might expect.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Recently Lacey extended Chanillo's boundedness result of commutators with fractional integrals to a higher parameter setting. In this paper, we extend Lacey's result to higher dimensional spaces by a different method. Our method is in terms of the dual relationship between product __BMO
## Abstract We present bounded positivity preserving operators from __L__~__p__~(β) to __L__~__q__~ (__β__), for 1 < __p__ < β, 1/pβ1/q < 1/2, which are not integral operators.
We prove that non-commutative martingale transforms are of weak type (1,1). More precisely, there is an absolute constant C such that if M is a semi-finite von Neumann algebra and Γ°M n Γ 1 nΒΌ1 is an increasing filtration of von Neumann subalgebras of M; then for any non-commutative martingale for e
If R is commutative and local, this concept reduces to the classical notion w x of regularity. In contrast to Walker's definition 21 , our concept is invariant under permutation of P P, and it implies that the P are pairwise i