๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research

โœ Scribed by Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization


Publisher
National Academies Press
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Leaves
251
Edition
1
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Clinical research presents health care providers with information on the natural history and clinical presentations of disease as well as diagnostic and treatment options. In today's healthcare system, patients, physicians, clinicians and family caregivers often lack the sufficient scientific data and evidence they need to determine the best course of treatment for the patients' medical conditions. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research(CER) is designed to fill this knowledge gap by assisting patients and healthcare providers across diverse settings in making more informed decisions. In this 2009 report, the Institute of Medicine's Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization establishes a working definition of CER, develops a priority list of research topics, and identifies the necessary requirements to support a robust and sustainable CER enterprise. As part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Congress appropriated $1.1 billion in federal support of CER, reflecting legislators' belief that better decisions about the use of health care could improve the public's health and reduce the cost of care. The Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization was successful in preparing a list 100 top priority CER topics and 10 recommendations for best practices in the field.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Priority Areas for National Action
โœ Committee on Identifying Priority Areas for Quality Improvement ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐ŸŒ English

(Institute of Medicine)Report is one in a series initiated by the Institute of Medicine to improve the quality of health care in America. Text specifies 20 areas recommended as priorities in need of quality improvement. Includes preventative health care, chronic disease management, long-term and pal

Comparative Effectiveness Research
โœ Mary A. M. Rogers ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2013 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press, USA ๐ŸŒ English

The last decade has seen sweeping changes in US health care policy. With more changes on the way, the emerging field of comparative effectiveness research-the science of determining how different treatments work best for different conditions-is critical for patients and clinicians who wish to make w

National Need and Priorities for Veterin
โœ Committee on Increasing Veterinary Involvement in Biomedical Research, National ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐ŸŒ English

The report identified various factors which contributed to creating an unfulfilled need for veterinarians in the biomedical research workforce, including an increase in the number of NIH grants utilizing animals and the burgeoning use of transgenic rodents, without a comparable change in the supply

Priorities for GEOINT Research at the Na
โœ Committee on Basic and Applied Research Priorities in Geospatial Science for the ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐ŸŒ English

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) provides geospatial intelligence (GEOINT) to support national security, both as a national intelligence and a combat support agency. In the post-9/11 world, the need for faster and more accurate geospatial intelligence is increasing. GEOINT uses imag

Methods in comparative effectiveness res
โœ Gatsonis, Constantine; Morton, Sally C ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2017 ๐Ÿ› Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis ๐ŸŒ English

<P>Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition or to improve the delivery of care (IOM 2009). CER is conducted to develop evidence that w