๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Infrared Measurements of Pristine and Disturbed Soils 1. Spectral Contrast Differences between Field and Laboratory Data

โœ Scribed by Jeffrey R Johnson; Paul G Lucey; Keith A Horton; Edwin M Winter


Book ID
104165477
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
777 KB
Volume
64
Category
Article
ISSN
0034-4257

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Comparison of emissivity spectra (8-13 lm) of pristine that observed for undisturbed and wet-sieved soils. Since it is a common practice to use laboratory spectra of field soils in the field with laboratory reflectance spectra of the same soils showed that laboratory spectra tend to have less samples to interpret spectra obtained remotely, we suggest that the influence of fine particle coatings on disturbed spectral contrast than field spectra (see following article). We investigated this phenomenon by measuring emission soils, if unrecognized, could influence interpretations of remote sensing data. Published by Elsevier Science spectra of both undisturbed (in situ) and disturbed soils Inc., 1998 (prepared as if for transport to the laboratory). The disturbed soils had much less spectral contrast than the undisturbed soils in the reststrahlen region near 9 lm. While


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Explaining differences between bioaccumu
โœ Henriette Selck; Ken Drouillard; Karen Eisenreich; Albert A Koelmans; Annemette ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry ๐ŸŒ English โš– 420 KB

## Abstract In the regulatory context, bioaccumulation assessment is often hampered by substantial data uncertainty as well as by the poorly understood differences often observed between results from laboratory and field bioaccumulation studies. Bioaccumulation is a complex, multifaceted process, w