๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Infrahuman outgroup or suprahuman ingroup: The role of nationalism and patriotism in the infrahumanization of outgroups

โœ Scribed by G. Tendayi Viki; Raff Calitri


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
87 KB
Volume
38
Category
Article
ISSN
0046-2772

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Previous research has shown that people are more likely to attribute uniquely human emotions to their ingroup than an outgroup (infrahumanization). In the current research, we examine whether these research findings are an indication of the infrahumanization of outgroups or the suprahumanization of the ingroup. We examined the role of nationalism and patriotism in the attribution of secondary emotions to groups. In line with the infrahumanization argument, we obtained a significant positive relationship between nationalism and the differential attribution of secondary emotions to the ingroup versus outgroup. In contrast, patriotism was negatively related to the differential attribution of secondary emotions. These findings indicate that the differential attribution of secondary emotions to the ingroup (vs. outgroup) is an indication of the derogation or infrahumanization of outgroups. Copyright ยฉ 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Differential processing of ingroup and o
โœ CONSTANTINE SEDIKIDES ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 219 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Perceivers individuate cognitively the ingroup more than the outgroup; that is, perceivers use person categories to process information about the ingroup, but use stereotypic attribute categories to process information about the outgroup. This phenomenon is labelled the differential processing effec

Perceptions of attitudinal similarity in
โœ SUZANNE C. THOMPSON; JEFFREY C. KOHLES; TERESA A. OTSUKI; DOUGLAS R. KENT ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 151 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The outgroup homogeneity phenomenon was examined by having majority group members (White Americans) judge the variability in attitudes about intergroup relations in their own group and one outgroup (African Americans). A preliminary study found the threat of the attitude statements to the group doin