๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Information evaluation under nonadditive expected utility

โœ Scribed by Irving H. Lavalle; Yongsheng Xu


Book ID
104627033
Publisher
Springer
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
865 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0895-5646

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


We examine the choice-of-single-stage-experiment problem (RaitIa and Schlaifer, 1961) under the assumption that the decider's (weak) preference relation > satisfies Schmeidler's (1989) or Gilboa's (1987) axiomatization and is thus representable by a nonadditive expected-utility functional as a Choquet integral w.r.t. a monotone probability measure on events. The basic properties of information value, certainty equivalent of information cost, net gain of information, and optimal choice of experiment that obtain (LaValle, 1968) when > satisfies the Anscombe-Aumann (1963) or Savage (1954) axiomatizations continue to obtain in the more general Schmeidler-Gilboa context-provided that there is no incentive to randomize the choice of experiment. When this proviso fails, information value can in general be assigned only to the set of available experiments.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expec
โœ Peter Wakker ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 625 KB

The aim of this paper is to convince the reader that Choquet-expected utility, as initiated by Schmeidler (1982Schmeidler ( , 1989) ) for decision making under uncertainty, when formulated for decision making under risk naturally leads to anticipated utility, as initiated by Quiggin/Yaari. Thus the