๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Influence of patients' preferences and treatment site on cancer patients' end-of-life care

โœ Scribed by Alexi A. Wright; Jennifer W. Mack; Patricia A. Kritek; Tracy A. Balboni; Anthony F. Massaro; Ursula A. Matulonis; Susan D. Block; Holly G. Prigerson


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
166 KB
Volume
116
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Research suggests that patients' endโ€ofโ€life (EOL) care is determined primarily by the medical resources available, and not by patient preferences. The authors examined whether patients' desire for lifeโ€extending therapy was associated with their EOL care.

METHODS:

Coping with Cancer is a multisite, prospective, longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer. Three hundred one patients were interviewed at baseline and followed until death, a median of 4.5 months later. Multivariate analyses examined the influence of patients' preferences and treatment site on whether patients received intensive care or hospice services in the final week of life.

RESULTS:

Eightyโ€three of 301 patients (27.6%) with advanced cancer wanted lifeโ€extending therapy at baseline. Patients who understood that their disease was terminal or who reported having EOL discussions with their physicians were less likely to want lifeโ€extending care compared with others (23.4% vs 42.6% and 20.7% vs 44.4%, respectively; P โ‰ค .003). Patients who were treated at Yale Cancer Center received more intensive care (odds ratio [OR], 3.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16โ€8.47) and less hospice services (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29โ€0.92) compared with patients who were treated at Parkland Hospital. However, in multivariate analyses that controlled for confounding influences, patients who preferred lifeโ€extending care were more likely to receive intensive care (adjusted OR [AOR], 2.91; 95% CI, 1.09โ€7.72) and were less likely to receive hospice services (AOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26โ€0.78). Treatment site was not identified as a significant predictor of EOL care.

CONCLUSIONS:

The treatment preferences of patients with advanced cancer may play a more important role in determining the intensity of medical care received at the EOL than previously recognized. Future research is needed to determine the mechanisms by which patients' preferences for care and treatment site interact to influence EOL care. Cancer 2010. ยฉ 2010 American Cancer Society.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cancer patient preferences for quality a
โœ Neal J. Meropol; Brian L. Egleston; Joanne S. Buzaglo; Al B. Benson III; Donald ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 114 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. Optimal patient decision making requires integration of patient values, goals, and preferences with information received from the physician. In the case of a lifeโ€threatening illness such as cancer, the weights placed on quality of life (QOL) and length of life (LOL) rep

Family perceptions of wishes of dementia
โœ Jenny T. Van Der Steen; Mirjam C. Van Soest-Poortvliet; Wilco P. Achterberg; Mie ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 79 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

antibiotics did not prolong suffering. However, in our study, antibiotics delayed dying for several days (van der Steen et al., 2009b). Moreover, antibiotics may prolong the dying process in more patients compared to the number of patients who obtain long-term survival. Although it is still unclear

Does somatization influence quality of l
โœ Bart Sheehan; Ranjit Lall; Christopher Bass ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 62 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Background Among older people, somatization has been reported to be common and to be predictive of high attendance in primary care. Its relationship with quality of life among older people has not been investigated. Objectives The objective was to establish whether, among older primary care attender