๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Influence of electrode site and size on variability of magnetic evoked potentials

โœ Scribed by Robert J.W. Dunnewold; Wim van der Kamp; Antoinette Maassen van den Brink; Marion Stijl; J. Gert van Dijk


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
140 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-639X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Successive magnetic evoked potentials (MEPs) concern varying motor neurons. We investigated whether this MEP-specific source of variability depends on electrode site and size. Amplitude variability (standard deviation) was largest over the center of the hypothenar muscles. Latencies were longer at distal and proximal sites than at the center site. Large electrodes (10 cm 2 ) did not decrease this source of amplitude variability compared with EEG electrodes, in contrast to other sources of variability.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Dantrolene modulates the influence of st
โœ A. Wieraszko ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 164 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Direct current-generated magnetic fields (2ยฑ3 mT, 20-min exposure) exerted biphasic effects on the population spike recorded from hippocampal slices. The initial decrease in the potential, observed during exposure of the slices to magnetic fields was followed by a recovery/amplification phase, which

The influence of the reference electrode
โœ Allison Brashear; John C. Kincaid ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 403 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Peroneal and tibial compound motor action potentials (CMAP) recorded using the standard belly-tendon montage have different configurations. The peroneal CMAP is a smooth dome shape, while the tibial CMAP has a slow-rising initial component followed by a higher amplitude negative peak. To evaluate po