## Abstract Water repellency is a widespread property of __Pinus pinaster__ and __Eucalyptus globulus__ forest soils in NW Spain and is particularly severe during the summer dry conditions. The aim of this work was to compare actual water repellency at field‐moist samples with potential water repel
Influence of biofilms on the water repellency of urban soil samples
✍ Scribed by Gabriele E. Schaumann; Burga Braun; Dörte Kirchner; Wolfgang Rotard; Ulrich Szewzyk; Elisabeth Grohmann
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 328 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6087
- DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.6746
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Water repellency is an important phenomenon in soil systems and is influenced by physical, chemical and biological factors. Studies on the influence of bacteria or surface‐attached bacteria (biofilms) on soil water repellency are rare.
In this study, we investigated the influence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic bacteria on soil wettability. Three different soil bacteria, Variovorax paradoxus, Bacillus sphaericus and an α‐Proteobacterium, were investigated in different states (vegetative cells and spores in the case of Bacillus sphaericus). The bacteria, isolated from urban soils in the Berlin Tiergarten Park and from a sewage field (in Berlin‐Buch), were grown in a bioreactor on sterilized soil samples and in batch cultures on four different synthetic materials with hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces, to form biofilms. Surface hydrophobicity of the overgrown material was determined by the water contact angle, and cell surface characteristics of bacteria were measured using the zeta potential and a hexadecane‐two‐phase‐system.
The α‐Proteobacterium and Variovorax paradoxus were classified as hydrophobic, and Bacillus sphaericus was classified as hydrophilic. Contact angles of the overgrown synthetic materials showed a significant influence of the respective material, but differences between the bacteria were not significant. The differences between the materials may be due to effects of the material on biofilm growth or EPS properties. EPS form biofilm matrices and are mainly responsible for aggregate cohesion. The bacterial EPS of the hydrophobic α‐Proteobacterium were more hydrophilic than the cell walls, while those of Bacillus sphaericus were less hydrophilic. In contrast to the artificial materials, differences in contact angle for the inoculated soil sample showed significant differences between the bacterial strains. The α‐Proteobacterium was able to hydrophobize the soil sample, while Bacillus sphaericus showed significant hydrophilization. The results clearly demonstrate the effect of bacterial biofilms on soil wettability. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The increase of surface runoff at the plot scale caused by soil water repellency is a generally accepted phenomenon. However, to improve the understanding of the effect of water repellency on runoff at the catchment scale, spatio‐temporal dynamics of water repellency have to be analysed
## Abstract The potential influence of pH on water repellency in soils has already been mentioned in some studies, but no clear correlation between these parameters has been found to date. In addition, although correlations of water content and water repellency have been found in numerous studies,
## Abstract Water repellence is an important factor in soil erosion due to its role in inhibiting the re‐establishment of vegetation after fire and due to its enhancement of run‐off. Water repellence is studied across a range of diverse disciplines, such as chemistry, materials, textiles and soil a
## Abstract Soil water repellency (hydrophobicity) is a naturally occurring phenomenon that can be intensified by soil heating during fires. Fire‐induced water repellency, together with the loss of plant cover, is reportedly the principal source of increased surface runoff and accelerated erosion i