๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Influence Diagnostics in Common Principal Components Analysis

โœ Scribed by Hong Gu; Wing K. Fung


Book ID
102603109
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
184 KB
Volume
79
Category
Article
ISSN
0047-259X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In principal components analysis, the influence function and local influence approaches have been well established as important diagnostic tools. In this article, we first review the generalized local influence approach in the restricted likelihood framework. We then apply the restricted likelihood local influence diagnostic in the common principal components analysis. One special part of this local influence result is an elliptical norm of the empirical influence function, which is comparable to the deletion diagnostic scaled by the same matrix which requires iterative solutions for parameter estimates with every case deleted. Local influence diagnostics are constructed by some basic building blocks that are obtained directly from the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters, and which are based on the original data and thus require less computation. A numerical example illustrates the technique and some joint influence effects are identified by the proposed method.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Common Principal Components in K Groups
โœ Bernhard N. Flury ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› American Statistical Association ๐ŸŒ English โš– 196 KB
Common Factor Analysis Versus Principal
โœ Hee-Ju Kim ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 212 KB

## Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine differences between two factor analytical methods and their relevance for symptom cluster research: common factor analysis (cfa) versus principal component analysis (pca). ## Methods: Literature was critically reviewed to elucidate the differenc