✦ LIBER ✦

Inference When a Nuisance Parameter Is Not Identified Under the Null Hypothesis

✍ Scribed by Hansen, Bruce E.

Book ID: 120014426
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 405 KB
Volume: 64
Category: Article
ISSN: 0012-9682
DOI: 10.2307/2171789

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Inference when a nuisance parameter is w

Inference when a nuisance parameter is weakly identified under the null hypothesis

✍ Stanislav Anatolyev 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 144 KB

Comparison of Maximum Statistics for Hyp

Comparison of Maximum Statistics for Hypothesis Testing When a Nuisance Parameter Is Present only under the Alternative

✍ Gang Zheng; Zehua Chen 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 126 KB

Optimal Tests when a Nuisance Parameter

Optimal Tests when a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only Under the Alternative

✍ Andrews, Donald W. K.; Ploberger, Werner 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 624 KB

The limiting bound of Efron's W-formula

The limiting bound of Efron's W-formula for hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative

✍ Qizhai Li; Gang Zheng; Aiyi Liu; Shifeng Xiong; Zhaohai Li; Kai Yu 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 228 KB

Behaviour of the standard and symmetric

Behaviour of the standard and symmetric Dickey–Fuller-type tests when there is a break under the null hypothesis

✍ Stephen J. Leybourne; Paul Newbold 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 222 KB

On the asymptotic behavior of the estima

On the asymptotic behavior of the estimate of the recombination fraction under the null hypothesis of no linkage when the model is misspecified

✍ Dr. John A. Williamson; Christopher I. Amos 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 535 KB

We show that under the null hypothesis of no linkage the maximum likelihood estimator of the recombination fraction converges to 1/2 even when the trait-related parameter values in the likelihood function are misspecified. Furthermore, we show that under the null hypothesis of no linkage, but with m