๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Inference to the Best Explanation

โœ Scribed by Peter Lipton


Publisher
Routledge
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Leaves
232
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


How do we go about weighing evidence, testing hypotheses, and making inferences? According to the model ofInference to the Best Explanation, we work out what to infer from the evidence by thinking about what would actually explain that evidence, and we take the ability of a hypothesis to explain the evidence as a sign that the hypothesis is correct. InInference to the Best Explanation, Peter Lipton gives this important and influential idea the development and assessment it deserves.

The second edition has been substantially enlarged and reworked, with a new chapter on the relationship between explanation and Bayesianism, and an extension and defence of the account of contrastive explanation. It also includes an expanded defence of the claims that our inferences really are guided by diverse explanatory considerations, and that this pattern of inference can take us towards the truth. This edition ofInference to the Best Explanationhas also been updated throughout and includes a new bibliography.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Best Explanations: New Essays on Inferen
โœ Kevin McCain and Ted Poston (Eds.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press, USA ๐ŸŒ English

Explanatory reasoning is ubiquitous. Not only are rigorous inferences to the best explanation used pervasively in the sciences, this kind of reasoning is common in everyday life. Despite its widespread use, inference to the best explanation is still in need of precise formulation, and it remains con

Inference to the Best Explanation (Inter
โœ Peter Lipton ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

How do we go about weighing evidence, testing hypotheses, and making inferences? According to the model of Inference to the Best Explanation, we work out what to infer from the evidence by thinking about what would actually explain that evidence, and we take the ability of a hypothesis to explain th