𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

INELASTIC SEISMIC RESISTANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STACK-LIKE STRUCTURES

✍ Scribed by GOYAL, ALOK; MAITI, MANOJ K.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
264 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0098-8847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A method is presented to quantify the inelastic seismic resistance of reinforced concrete stack-like structures by non-linear earthquake analysis. The deformed configuration of stack is idealized as an assemblage of beam elements and actual stress-strain relationships of concrete and reinforcing steel are used to evaluate element matrices. Repeated non-linear analyses are performed by gradually increasing the intensity of acceleration time histories to a level where collapse of the stack is observed in primary stresses. The set of time histories thus obtained are then used to define the ultimate intensity of ground motion that the stack can sustain if inelastic deformations are permitted. A procedure is presented to quantify the difference between inelastic seismic resistance and elastic seismic resistance in terms of displacement ductility capacity factors. For seismic design using available inelastic resistance, values of curvature ductility factor demand for the cross-sections of stacks are also presented.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Seismic resistance of steel confined rei
✍ Aboutaha, Riyad S. ;Machado, Rafael πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 418 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Tall building columns are subjected to high axial loads particularly at lower levels. In zones of high seismicity, these columns have to maintain their axial load carrying capacity during an earthquake. Conventional ordinary reinforced concrete, structural steel and concrete filled tube columns are

An experimental study on seismic respons
✍ Zongjian Lan; Yuji Tian; Liang Fang; Shuting Liang; Xinde Wang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 298 KB

## Abstract Two models are tested on a shake‐table. One of the models is a normal reinforced concrete megaframe structure and the other is a multifunctional vibration‐absorption reinforced concrete megaframe structure in which the laminated rubber bearings are placed between the major frame and the