𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Industrial wastewater treatment in a membrane bioreactor: A review

✍ Scribed by Marrot, B. ;Barrios-Martinez, A. ;Moulin, P. ;Roche, N.


Publisher
American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
293 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0278-4491

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

This paper provides a detailed literature review of wastewater treatment in a membrane bioreactor process (MBR) with special focus on industrial wastewater treatment. MBR systems are compared with conventional wastewater treatment systems. The characteristics of the bioreactor treatment process (biomass concentration and floc size, organic and mass loading rates, etc.) are examined. The membrane separation of microorganisms from the treated wastewater is discussed in detail. Problems of membrane fouling and membrane washing and regeneration, linked to activated sludge characteristics, are examined. Β© 2004 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 23: 59–68, 2004


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Process intensification in wastewater tr
✍ Turgay Pekdemir; Bulent Keskinler; Ergun Yildiz; Galip Akay πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 175 KB

## Abstract Biooxidation of ferrous iron (Fe^2+^) from strongly acidic industrial wastewater with a high Fe^2+^ content by __Thiobacillus ferrooxidans__ in a packed bed reactor and subsequent removal of ferric iron (Fe^3+^) by a crossflow microfiltration (membrane) process have been investigated as

Membrane Ozonation in Wastewater Treatme
✍ Janknecht, Peter ;Picard, CΓ©line ;Larbot, AndrΓ© ;Wilderer, Peter A. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 146 KB
Development of a control algorithm for a
✍ Giuliana Ferrero; Hector MonclΓΊs; Gianluigi Buttiglieri; Sara Gabarron; Joaquim πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 144 KB

## Abstract **BACKGROUND:** Membrane bioreactors are used in an increasing number of wastewater treatment facilities because of their compactness and efficiency in solid‐liquid separation, but energy requirements are still higher than other competitive technologies such as conventional activated sl