𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Induction of labor: the misoprostol controversy

✍ Scribed by Alisa B. Goldberg; Deborah A. Wing


Book ID
104442302
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
75 KB
Volume
48
Category
Article
ISSN
1526-9523

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Misoprostol (Cytotec) is safe and effective for induction of labor, although it is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in pregnancy. In August 2000, the manufacturer of misoprostol warned against its use in pregnancy because of its abortifacient properties and cited reports of maternal and fetal deaths when misoprostol was used to induce labor, fueling the misoprostol controversy. More than 45 randomized trials including more than 5400 women have found vaginal misoprostol to be more effective than oxytocin or vaginal prostaglandin E2 at effecting vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Cesarean delivery rates with vaginal misoprostol are lower than with oxytocin alone, but similar to prostaglandin E2. There have been no significant differences in the frequency of serious adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes with low‐dose misoprostol compared with oxytocin or prostaglandin E2; however, the relative risk of rare adverse outcomes with misoprostol is unknown. The data suggest that absolute risks are low when misoprostol is used appropriately. We recommend 25 mcg vaginally every 4 to 6 hours for carefully selected patients in closely monitored settings. Whether misoprostol will prove to be the most cost‐effective agent for inducing labor in women with an unfavorable cervix remains to be determined.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Misoprostol in Labor Induction
✍ Dr. Hakan Ozan; GΓΌrkan Uncu; Volkan Yildirim; Melike Omak; Havva Filiz Kara; Meh πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 353 KB
Misoprostol as a labor induction agent
✍ Paul M. Magtibay; Kirk D. Ramin; Denise Y. Harris; Patrick S. Ramsey; Paul L. Og πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 36 KB

The objective of this investigation was to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of intravaginal misoprostol as a labor induction agent to a standard protocol using prostaglandin E 2 (Prepidil) and intravenous oxytocin. Thirty-eight patients requiring induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix (