𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy for T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Rakesh M. Nathu; William M. Mendenhall; James T. Parsons; Anthony A. Mancuso; Robert R. Carroll


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
132 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
1065-7541

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Between 1964 and 1996, 123 patients were treated for T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma; 93 were treated with radiation therapy alone; 30 were treated with induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Patients who received induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy were treated between 1985 and 1996; during this time 39 patients were treated with radiation therapy alone. Five-year local control rates for patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy, radiation therapy alone (all patients), and radiation therapy alone (patients treated since September 1985) were 63%, 38%, and 48%, respectively. The five-year rates of freedom from distant metastasis were 87%, 73%, and 76%, respectively. The five-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates were 58%, 27%, and 37%, respectively, while the five-year absolute survival rates were 42%, 17%, and 23%, respectively. Improvements in local control and freedom from distant metastasis in those receiving chemotherapy were not statistically significant, while the improvements in cause-specific survival and absolute survival were significant at the P < or = 0.05 level. Induction chemotherapy may improve the cure rate for patients with T4 oropharyngeal carcinoma. Although encouraging, these data are nonrandomized and should be interpreted with caution.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Induction therapy for rectal carcinoma
✍ Paul M. Busse; Andrea Ng; Abram Recht πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 41 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Induction, or preoperative therapy for rectal carcinoma, is a controversial topic which appears to have clinical utility in a number of distinct settings that range from early stage to locally advanced disease. Common to all treatment scenarios is the intent of reducing the likelihood of recurrence

Concurrent chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil
✍ Yano, Masahiko; Tsujinaka, Toshimasa; Shiozaki, Hitoshi; Inoue, Masatoshi; Doki, πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 105 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Background and Objectives: Since the prognosis of patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus is extremely poor, an effective multimodal treatment needs to be established. Methods: Forty-five patients with SCC of the esophagus at the T4 classification of the disease but no hemato

A randomized trial comparing radiation t
✍ Carlos Manoel M. AraΓΊjo; Luis Souhami; Roberto A. Gil; Roberto Carvalho; JosΓ© A. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 388 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

From September 1982 to December 1985, 59 previously untreated patients with Stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus were randomly assigned to receive radiation therapy (RT) alone versus the concomitant use of RT and chemotherapy (CT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitomycin C, and bl