## Abstract The present study was conducted to determine whether adolescents and/or the elderly are more sensitive to mobile phone (MP)‐related bioeffects than young adults, and to determine this for both 2nd generation (2G) GSM, and 3rd generation (3G) W‐CDMA exposures. To test this, resting alpha
Individual differences in the effects of mobile phone exposure on human sleep: Rethinking the problem
✍ Scribed by Sarah P. Loughran; Raymond J. McKenzie; Melinda L. Jackson; Mark E. Howard; Rodney J. Croft
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 115 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0197-8462
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Mobile phone exposure‐related effects on the human electroencephalogram (EEG) have been shown during both waking and sleep states, albeit with slight differences in the frequency affected. This discrepancy, combined with studies that failed to find effects, has led many to conclude that no consistent effects exist. We hypothesised that these differences might partly be due to individual variability in response, and that mobile phone emissions may in fact have large but differential effects on human brain activity. Twenty volunteers from our previous study underwent an adaptation night followed by two experimental nights in which they were randomly exposed to two conditions (Active and Sham), followed by a full‐night sleep episode. The EEG spectral power was increased in the sleep spindle frequency range in the first 30 min of non‐rapid eye movement (non‐REM) sleep following Active exposure. This increase was more prominent in the participants that showed an increase in the original study. These results confirm previous findings of mobile phone‐like emissions affecting the EEG during non‐REM sleep. Importantly, this low‐level effect was also shown to be sensitive to individual variability. Furthermore, this indicates that previous negative results are not strong evidence for a lack of an effect and, given the far‐reaching implications of mobile phone research, we may need to rethink the interpretation of results and the manner in which research is conducted in this field. Bioelectromagnetics 33:86–93, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES