✦ LIBER ✦

Individual differences in susceptibility to interference and general cognitive ability

✍ Scribed by Frank N. Dempster; Alice J. Corkill

Book ID: 113967691
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 184 KB
Volume: 101
Category: Article
ISSN: 0001-6918
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00013-x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A twin study of gender-influenced indivi

A twin study of gender-influenced individual differences in general cognitive ability

✍ Valerie S. Knopik; John C. DeFries 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 506 KB

Individual differences in mathematical a

Individual differences in mathematical ability: genetic, cognitive and behavioural factors

✍ John W. Adams 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 82 KB

Individual differences in digit span, su

Individual differences in digit span, susceptibility to proactive interference, and aptitude/achievement test scores

✍ Frank N. Dempster; John B. Cooney 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 893 KB

Individual differences in reappraisal ab

Individual differences in reappraisal ability: Links to reappraisal frequency, well-being, and cognitive control

✍ Kateri McRae; Scott E. Jacobs; Rebecca D. Ray; Oliver P. John; James J. Gross 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 187 KB

Individual differences in control of lan

Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities

✍ Julia Festman; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Thomas F Münte 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 339 KB

Individual differences in susceptibility

Individual differences in susceptibility to memory illusions

✍ Eugene Winograd; Jennifer P. Peluso; Todd A. Glover 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB 👁 2 views

Forty-two individuals studied sixteen word lists, each of which converged on a common list associate that was not studied. Ten measures of individual dierences in cognition and personality were also administered. The tendency to intrude words in recall and to falsely recognize distractor words in a