๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Incremental distributed modelling investigation in a small agricultural catchment: 2. Erosion and phosphorus transport

โœ Scribed by Antti Taskinen; Michael Bruen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
223 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6087

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Distributed physically based erosion and phosphorus (P) transport models, run by the overland flow model described in Taskinen and Bruen (2006. Hydrological Processes 20: this issue), are described. In the erosion model, the additional components to the basic model were the outflow of the particles by infiltration and a new model component, i.e. deposition when rainfall stops. Two ways of calculating the shielding factor due to the flow depth were compared. The P transport model had both dissolved P (DP) and particulate P (PP) components. The processes included in the DP model were desorption from the soil surface, advection, storage in the overland flow and infiltration. The PP model accounted for advection, storage in the flow, infiltration, detachment from the soil surface by flow and rainfall and deposition both when transport capacity of suspended solids (SS) is exceeded and when rainfall ceases. When the models were developed and validated in small agricultural fields of cohesive soil types in southern Finland, comparisons were made between corresponding processes and the significance of added components were estimated in order to find out whether increased model complexity improves the model performance. The sedigraphs were found to follow the dynamics of rainfall, emphasizing the importance of the rainfall splash component. The basic model was too slow to react to changes in rainfall and flow rates, but infiltration and deposition that acts during the cessation in rainfall improved the model significantly by enabling the modelled SS to fall sharply enough. The shielding effect of flow depth from the splash detachment was found to play a significant role. Transport capacity should also be included in erosion models when they are applied to cohesive soils. In this study, the Yalin method worked well. A strong correlation was obvious between the measured SS and total P concentrations, indicating that the main form of P in runoff is PP. This emphasizes the importance of a good sediment transport model in P transport modelling. The submodel used for DP desorption from the soil surface produced plausible results without any calibration. Copyright ยฉ 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Incremental distributed modelling invest
โœ Antti Taskinen; Michael Bruen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 252 KB

## Abstract A distributed overland flow model is presented and the test results compared with those of the unit hydrograph (UH) model. Infiltration excess in the overland model was calculated using both a modified Green and Ampt (Gโ€“A) method and a more complicated method that keeps track of the soi

Modelling upland and instream erosion, s
โœ Anthony J. Jakeman; Timothy R. Green; Sara G. Beavis; Li Zhang; Claude R. Dietri ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 131 KB

This overview presents background information to place the subsequent papers by Beavis et al., Dietrich et al. and Green et al. in the context of a uniยฎed approach. The modelling framework described here consists of two major components: an upland catchment model and an instream sediment transport m