## Abstract Regional values of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (__D__~av~) of in vivo and excised rat spinal cords were measured using an iscosahedral encoding scheme that is based on 21 uniformly distributed and alternating gradient directions with an echo planar imaging (EPI) read
In vivo sodium imaging of human patellar cartilage with a 3D cones sequence at 3 T and 7 T
✍ Scribed by Ernesto Staroswiecki; Neal K. Bangerter; Paul T. Gurney; Thomas Grafendorfer; Garry E. Gold; Brian A. Hargreaves
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 215 KB
- Volume
- 32
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose:
To compare signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) and T*~2~ maps at 3 T and 7 T using 3D cones from in vivo sodium images of the human knee.
Materials and Methods:
Sodium concentration has been shown to correlate with glycosaminoglycan content of cartilage and is a possible biomarker of osteoarthritis. Using a 3D cones trajectory, 17 subjects were scanned at 3 T and 12 at 7 T using custom‐made sodium‐only and dual‐tuned sodium/proton surface coils, at a standard resolution (1.3 × 1.3 × 4.0 mm^3^) and a high resolution (1.0 × 1.0 × 2.0 mm^3^). We measured the SNR of the images and the T*~2~ of cartilage at both 3 T and 7 T.
Results:
The average normalized SNR values of standard‐resolution images were 27.1 and 11.3 at 7 T and 3 T. At high resolution, these average SNR values were 16.5 and 7.3. Image quality was sufficient to show spatial variations of sodium content. The average T*~2~ of cartilage was measured as 13.2 ± 1.5 msec at 7 T and 15.5 ± 1.3 msec at 3 T.
Conclusion:
We acquired sodium images of patellar cartilage at 3 T and 7 T in under 26 minutes using 3D cones with high resolution and acceptable SNR. The SNR improvement at 7 T over 3 T was within the expected range based on the increase in field strength. The measured T*~2~ values were also consistent with previously published values. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:446–451. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES