## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of generalized phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC‐MRI) for the noninvasive assessment of fluctuating velocities in cardiovascular blood flow. ## Materials and Methods Multidimensional PC‐MRI was used in a generalized manner to map mea
In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase-contrast MRI
✍ Scribed by John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Petter Dyverfeldt; Andreas Sigfridsson; Stefan Franzén; Lars Wigström; Ann F. Bolger; Tino Ebbers
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 305 KB
- Volume
- 31
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose:
To assess in vitro the three‐dimensional mean velocity field and the extent and degree of turbulence intensity (TI) in different prosthetic heart valves using a generalization of phase‐contrast MRI (PC‐MRI).
Materials and Methods:
Four 27‐mm aortic valves (Björk‐Shiley Monostrut tilting‐disc, St. Jude Medical Standard bileaflet, Medtronic Mosaic stented and Freestyle stentless porcine valve) were tested under steady inflow conditions in a Plexiglas phantom. Three‐dimensional PC‐MRI data were acquired to measure the mean velocity field and the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), a direction‐independent measure of TI.
Results:
Velocity and TI estimates could be obtained up‐ and downstream of the valves, except where metallic structure in the valves caused signal void. Distinct differences in the location, extent, and peak values of velocity and TI were observed between the valves tested. The maximum values of TKE varied between the different valves: tilting disc, 100 J/m^3^; bileaflet, 115 J/m^3^; stented, 200 J/m^3^; stentless, 145 J/m^3^.
Conclusion:
The TI downstream from a prosthetic heart valve is dependent on the specific valve design. Generalized PC‐MRI can be used to quantify velocity and TI downstream from prosthetic heart valves, which may allow assessment of these aspects of prosthetic valvular function in postoperative patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:1075–1080. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES