𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

In vitro and In vivo study on the effect of autogenous cancellous bone and intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate on allograft construct strength

✍ Scribed by Peter D. Hanson; Chad Warner; Frank J. Frassica; Ray Vanderby Jr.; Mark D. Markel


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
803 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
0736-0266

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

An in vitro study was performed to compare the effects of augmenting interlocking nails of one of two diameter (5 or 6 mm) with intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate. Subsequently, an in vivo study was performed to compare the effects of augmenting the interlocking nail with five combinations of intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate and autogenous cancellous bone applied to the periosteal surface or within the medullary canal. Dogs were killed 6 months after the procedure for biomechanical evaluation of the femora in axial compression, mediolateral and craniocaudal bending, and torsion. Results from the __in vitro__study at the proximal osteotomy indicated the 6‐mm inteilocking nail with intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate had greater stiffness than the 5‐mm interlocking nail without it (p < 0.05). At the distal osteotomy, regardless of the diameter of the interlocking nail, the addition of intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate increased stiffness (p < 0.05). Results from the in vivo study indicated greater global construct stiffness with an interlocking nail alone, an interlocking nail augmented with intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate and cancellous bone at the periosteal surface, and an interlocking nail augmented with cancellous bone within the medullary canal and at the periosteal surface (p < 0.05). At the osteotomy level, the interlocking nail augmented with intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate and cancellous bone at the periosteal surface had greater stiffness than did an interlocking nail alone or an interlocking nail augmented with either intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate. cancellous bone within the medullary canal, or cancellous bone at the periosteal surface (p < 0.05) but produced the same results as an interlocking nail augmented with cancellous bone within the medullary canal and at the periosteal surface. The results suggest that augmenting interlocking nail fixation with intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate by itself offers no advantage but that acombination of intramedullary polymethylmethacrylate and cancellous bone at the periosteal surface improves structural properties at 6 months.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Effect of intramedullary polymethylmetha
✍ Peter D. Hanson; Chad Warner; Rachael Kofroth; Christian Osmond; John J. Bogdans 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 914 KB

## Abstract This study was designed to compare bone mineral density, periosteal callus production. new bone formation, bone porosity, histologic appearance, and union of mid‐diaphyseal segmental allografts of the femur stabilized with an interlocking nail technique in a canine model 4 months after

A preliminary in vitro and in vivo study
✍ L. Savarino; D. Benetti; N. Baldini; C. Tarabusi; M. Greco; R. Aloisi; S. Frasca 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 408 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Osteolysis, that is, progressive periprosthetic bone loss, is responsible for approximately 70% of aseptic loosening and implant failure. Usually, it is due to a granulomatous reaction wear‐induced, leading to macrophage and osteoclast‐mediated bone resorption. At present, there is no e

In vivo study on the healing of bone def
✍ D. Dallari; M. Fini; C. Stagni; P. Torricelli; N. Nicoli Aldini; G. Giavaresi; E 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 836 KB

## Abstract The repair of confined trabecular bone defects in rabbits treated by autologous bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC), platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), freeze‐dried bone allografts (FDBA) alone and in combination (BMSC + PRP; FDBA + BMSC; FDBA + PRP; FDBA + PRP + BMSC) was compared. A critical si