✦ LIBER ✦

Improvement of amplitude variability of motor evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients and in healthy subjects

✍ Scribed by Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen

Book ID: 116159866
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 728 KB
Volume: 101
Category: Article
ISSN: 0924-980X
DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(96)96541-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Visual evoked potentials in normal subje

Visual evoked potentials in normal subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis

✍ Mogens Kjær 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 628 KB

Motor evoked potentials in multiple scle

Motor evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients without walking limitation: amplitude vs. conduction time abnormalities

✍ Andrea Gagliardo; Francesca Galli; Antonello Grippo; Aldo Amantini; Cristiana Ma 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 242 KB

Variability of cortically evoked motor r

Variability of cortically evoked motor responses in multiple sclerosis

✍ T.C. Britton; B.-U. Meyer; R. Benecke 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 761 KB

Improvement in motor evoked potentials a

Improvement in motor evoked potentials and clinical course post-steroid therapy in multiple sclerosis

✍ J.Y. Salle; J. Hugon; F. Tabaraud; J.M. Boulesteix; J.M. Vallat; M. Dumas; C.M. 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 382 KB

The latency distribution of motor evoked

The latency distribution of motor evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis

✍ Lea Firmin; Samuel Müller; Kai M. Rösler 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 740 KB

Frequency-dependent conduction delay of

Frequency-dependent conduction delay of motor-evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis

✍ Jørgen FeldbæK Nielsen 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 201 KB 👁 2 views

Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied in 33 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and in 21 healthy controls. A major abnormality was found in latency of the second motor-evoked potential in MS patients. At interstimulus intervals of 75, 100, and 150 ms the central motor conduction time (C