✦ LIBER ✦

Improved surface impedance methods for 2-D and 3-D problems

✍ Scribed by Deeley, E.M.; Xiang, J.

Book ID: 114548961
Publisher: IEEE
Year: 1988
Tongue: English
Weight: 237 KB
Volume: 24
Category: Article
ISSN: 0018-9464
DOI: 10.1109/20.43891

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Modified surface impedance boundary cond

Modified surface impedance boundary conditions for 3D eddy current problems

✍ Jingguo, W.; Lavers, J.D. 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 IEEE 🌐 English ⚖ 395 KB

Finite difference method for 2-D and 3-D

Finite difference method for 2-D and 3-D nonlinear free surface wave problems

✍ Lü Yulin; Li Baoyuan 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mec 🌐 English ⚖ 551 KB

An Improved Multiquadric Collocation Met

An Improved Multiquadric Collocation Method for 3-D Electromagnetic Problems

✍ Yong Zhang; Shao, K.R.; Youguang Guo; Jianguo Zhu; Xie, D.X.; Lavers, J.D. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 IEEE 🌐 English ⚖ 311 KB

Spectral methods for 2D Riemann problems

✍ Sidi M. Ould Kaber; Carole Rosier 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB

We consider Riemann problems for a linear hyperbolic equation. At time t > 0, the solution is known outside the disk D(0, t). Inside this disk, we make coordinate transformations and obtain an elliptic problem which is solved by a spectral tau method. We compare the result with the spectral viscosit

The method of fundamental solutions for

The method of fundamental solutions for 2D and 3D Stokes problems

✍ D.L. Young; S.J. Jane; C.M. Fan; K. Murugesan; C.C. Tsai 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 396 KB

Comparison between 3D, 2D finite element

Comparison between 3D, 2D finite element methods and analytical calculations for electromagnetic problems

✍ Logcais, E.; Yonnet, J.-P.; Coulomb, J.-L.; Meunier, G.; Gitosusastro, S. 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 IEEE 🌐 English ⚖ 498 KB