𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Improved outcomes in patients with osteogenic sarcoma of the head and neck

✍ Scribed by Snehal G. Patel; Paul Meyers; Andrew G. Huvos; Suzanne Wolden; Bhuvanesh Singh; Ashok R. Shaha; Jay O. Boyle; David Pfister; Jatin P. Shah; Dennis H. Kraus


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
88 KB
Volume
95
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current study reviews the authors' recent institutional experience in the treatment of osteosarcoma of the head and neck (OSHN).

METHODS

The clinical records of 44 patients who were treated between 1981 and 1998 for OSHN were reviewed retrospectively. Archived histologic material was reviewed and data were analyzed to identify factors predictive of disease control and survival. Outcomes were compared with a previously reported historic cohort treated at the study institution.

RESULTS

Patients ranged in age from 6 to 64 years (median, 31 years). The mandible was the primary site in 18 patients (41%), the maxilla in 20 patients (45%), and the skull in 6 patients (14%). Surgery was employed in all 44 patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 30 patients (68%), and postoperative radiation therapy was given to 7 patients (16%). The surgical excision margins were positive in 13 patients (30%). High‐grade lesions were reported in 50% patients and low‐grade lesions were noted in 18% of patients (grade was not assessable in 32%). Histologic response was “unfavorable” in 22 of 30 patients (73%) who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 3‐year overall, disease‐specific, and recurrence‐free survival rates were approximately 81%, 81%, and 73%, respectively (median follow‐up of 41 months). Positive surgical margins were found to be the only significant predictor of worse disease‐specific survival. Compared with the historical cohort, the current experience demonstrated an obvious improvement in the 5‐year local control (35% vs. 78%), distant metastases (37% vs. 13%), and overall survival (23% vs. 70%).

CONCLUSIONS

Negative surgical margins were found to be the only significant predictor of overall and disease‐specific survival. The results of the current study represent a considerable improvement over the authors' previously published experience and compare favorably with the results reported in the literature. Cancer 2002;95:1495–503. © 2002 American Cancer Society.

DOI 10.1002/cncr.10849


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy in pat
✍ Roxana Diba; Hossein Saadati; Bita Esmaeli 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB 👁 2 views

Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in patients with head and neck tumors. Methods. The clinical records of all 31 patients with head and neck tumors who underwent DCR for nasolacrimal duct blockage at The University of Texas M. D. Ander

Outcomes following reirradiation of pati
✍ David P. Goldstein; Lucy Hynds Karnell; Min Yao; G. Parker Chamberlin; Thanh X. 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 128 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Background This study reports the outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer who received reirradiation with palliative or curative intent. ## Methods A retrospective review of 41 patients treated with curative (__n__ = 28) or palliative (__n__ = 13) reirradiation was conduct

Survival in patients with synovial sarco
✍ William J. Harb; Mario A. Luna; Shreyaskumar R. Patel; Matthew T. Ballo; Dianna 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 157 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. The medical literature on synovial sarcoma (SS) of the head and neck region is limited. Thus, we determined whether clinical characteristics and treatment were associated with recurrence and survival rates in patients with SS of the head and neck. ## Methods. We retros