With the objective of improving side-chain conformation prediction, we have analyzed the influence of various factors on prediction by the Self-Consistent Mean Field Theory method, applied to a set of high resolution x-ray protein structure models. These factors may be classed as variations in the m
Improved modeling of side-chains in proteins with rotamer-based methods: A flexible rotamer model
✍ Scribed by Joaquim Mendes; António M. Baptista; Maria Arménia Carrondo; Cláudio M. Soares
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 454 KB
- Volume
- 37
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0887-3585
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Side-chain modeling has a widespread application in many current methods for protein tertiary structure determination, prediction, and design. Of the existing side-chain modeling methods, rotamer-based methods are the fastest and most efficient. Classically, a rotamer is conceived as a single, rigid conformation of an amino acid sidechain. Here, we present a flexible rotamer model in which a rotamer is a continuous ensemble of conformations that cluster around the classic rigid rotamer. We have developed a thermodynamically based method for calculating effective energies for the flexible rotamer. These energies have a one-to-one correspondence with the potential energies of the rigid rotamer. Therefore, the flexible rotamer model is completely general and may be used with any rotamer-based method in substitution of the rigid rotamer model. We have compared the performance of the flexible and rigid rotamer models with one side-chain modeling method in particular (the selfconsistent mean field theory method) on a set of 20 high quality crystallographic protein structures. For the flexible rotamer model, we obtained average predictions of 85.8% for 1 , 76.5% for 1ϩ2 and 1.34 A for root-mean-square deviation (RMSD); the corresponding values for core residues were 93.0%, 87.7% and 0.70 A ˚, respectively. These values represent improvements of 7.3% for 1 , 8.1% for 1ϩ2 and 0.23 A for RMSD over the predictions obtained with the rigid rotamer model under otherwise identical conditions; the corresponding improvements for core residues were 6.9%, 10.5% and 0.43 A ˚, respectively. We found that the predictions obtained with the flexible rotamer model were also significantly better than those obtained for the same set of proteins with another state-of-the-art side-chain placement method in the literature, especially for core residues. The flexible rotamer model represents a considerable improvement over the classic rigid rotamer model. It can, therefore, be used with considerable advantage in all rotamer-based methods commonly applied to protein tertiary structure determination, prediction, and design and also in predictions of free energies in mutational studies. Proteins 1999;37:530-543.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES