𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Implementation of a short-stay programme after breast cancer surgery

✍ Scribed by M. de Kok; T. van der Weijden; A. C. Voogd; C. D. Dirksen; C. J. H. van de Velde; J. A. Roukema; C. Finaly-Marais; F. W. van der Ent; M. F. von Meyenfeldt


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
104 KB
Volume
97
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

Short-stay breast cancer surgery (24 h or day case) is not common practice in Europe. This before–after comparative study was carried out to test the feasibility of systematically implementing a care programme incorporating short-stay admission using strategies tailored to individual hospital needs, and to assess safety and facilitating factors.

Methods

Patients with breast cancer from four Dutch hospitals participated. The intervention concerned the programme developed by the Maastricht University Medical Centre. This was implemented through local multidisciplinary meetings and educational outreach visits.

Results

Of 421 eligible patients, 324 (77Β·0 per cent) gave consent to participate. The proportion of patients who had short-stay treatment increased from 45Β·3 per cent before to 82Β·2 per cent after implementation of the programme (P < 0Β·001). No increase was observed in the rate of complications, readmissions, reoperations or number of visits to the emergency department. Factors associated with an increased chance of short-stay treatment were: breast-conserving surgery, having children and being employed. Being aged over 64 years showed a trend towards a decreased chance.

Conclusion

Introducing a care programme incorporating short stay following breast cancer surgery in four hospitals was feasible and safe.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Author's reply: Implementation of a shor
✍ M. de Kok πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 106 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published