𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Implanted deep brain stimulator and 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

✍ Scribed by Norbert Kovacs; Ferenc Nagy; Ferenc Kover; Adam Feldmann; Carlos Llumiguano; Jozsef Janszky; Gyula Kotek; Tamas Doczi; Istvan Balas


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
103 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

There is a great need for MRI examinations of patients who have previously undergone deep brain stimulator (DBS) implantation. The current guidelines pertain only to a 1.5‐Tesla horizontal‐bore scanner complying with strict safety regulations. Moreover, almost all published in vitro and in vivo studies concerning patient safety are carried out on 1.5 Tesla MR scanners. The aim of our work is to share our clinical experience of 1.0‐Tesla brain MR imaging. During the past four years, 34 patients with different types of implanted DBS systems underwent 1.0‐Tesla MR examinations to answer diagnostic or clinical questions. Apart from the scanner type applied, all other safety instructions were strictly followed. The MRI itself made no significant difference to the measured impedances or the stimulation parameters required to achieve the optimal therapeutic results. From theoretical considerations, it may be assumed that 1.0‐Tesla MRI can be performed safely on DBS‐implanted patients, provided that all other recommendations are adhered to. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Performing functional magnetic resonance
✍ Paula R. Arantes; Ellison F. Cardoso; Maria Â. Barreiros; Manoel J. Teixeira; Má 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB 👁 1 views

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a relatively novel treatment in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a useful technique for examining the effects of DBS both within the basal ganglia and its cortical connectivity. There are technical difficulties in imag

Cardiac magnetic resonance parallel imag
✍ Kiaran P. McGee; Josef P. Debbins; Ed B. Boskamp; LeRoy Blawat; Lisa Angelos; Ke 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 319 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To quantify changes in signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), specific absorption rate (SAR), RF power deposition, and imaging time in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with and without the application of parallel imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. ## Materia

Experimentally verified, theoretical des
✍ Gary X. Shen; J.F. Wu; Fernando E. Boada; Keith R. Thulborn 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 260 KB 👁 2 views

A new theoretical method is presented for designing frequency responses of double-tuned, low-pass birdcage coils. This method is based on Kirchhoff's equations through a nonsymmetric matrix algorithm and extended through a modification of the corresponding eigenvalue system from a single-tuned mode.

Dynamically shimmed multivoxel 1H magnet
✍ Kevin M. Koch; Laura I. Sacolick; Terence W. Nixon; Scott McIntyre; Douglas L. R 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 217 KB

## Abstract In vivo multivoxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and multislice Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI) are extremely susceptible to poor homogeneity of the static magnetic field. Existing room‐temperature (RT) shim technology can adequately optimize the __B__~0~ homogen