๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Impact of Screening Test Performance and Cost on Mortality Reduction and Cost-effectiveness of Multimodal Ovarian Cancer Screening

โœ Scribed by Drescher, C. W.; Hawley, S.; Thorpe, J. D.; Marticke, S.; McIntosh, M.; Gambhir, S. S.; Urban, N.


Book ID
115537447
Publisher
American Association for Cancer Research
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
371 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
1940-6207

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer
โœ Paul J. Van Der Maas; Harry J. De Koning; B. Martin Van Ineveld; Gerrit J. Van O ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 728 KB

The costs and effects of different invitation schedules of breast cancer screening are compared. The effect estimates are based on trials from the USA, Sweden and the Netherlands. The cost estimates use registration data, file studies and organization charts. The calculations were performed with the

Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screen
โœ Naoyuki Okamoto ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 213 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

## BACKGROUND. Because the mortality rate from lung cancer is increasing sharply in Japan, lung cancer screening is being performed actively to assure early diagnosis and early treatment. However, its effectiveness is not clear, because it is extremely difficult to diagnose early microcarcinoma of

Examining the cost-effectiveness of canc
โœ M. Robyn Andersen; Nicole Urban; Scott Ramsey; Peter A. Briss ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 111 KB

Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) can help to quantify the contribution of the promotion of a screening program to increased participation in screening. The cost-effectiveness (C/E) of screening promotion depends in large part on the endpoints of interest. At the most fundamental level, the C/E of