Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in lymph nodal and mediastinal lesions: A multicenter experience
โ Scribed by Pio Zeppa; Enrica Barra; Vincenzo Napolitano; Immacolata Cozzolino; Giancarlo Troncone; Marco Picardi; Amalia De Renzo; Pier Paolo Mainenti; Antonio Vetrani; Lucio Palombini
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 483 KB
- Volume
- 39
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 8755-1039
- DOI
- 10.1002/dc.21450
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an established procedure in lung cancer (LC) staging and in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses. Most of the experiences reported refer to single specialized centers where dedicated teams of endoscopists and pathologists perform the procedure. We report the EUS-FNA experience of a cooperation group involving clinicians and cytopathologists from three hospitals. Fifty-seven consecutive EUS-FNA of mediastinal nodes in LC patients, eight mediastinal and two subdiaphragmatic masses were collected in 3 years. EUS-FNA was performed by two endoscopists and three experienced pathologists. On-site evaluation was performed in all cases by the three cytopathologists. Lymph node negative cases underwent surgery, which confirmed the cytological diagnoses but also detected two false negatives. Four of the 10 EUS cytological diagnoses of mediastinal and subdiaphragmatic masses were histologically confirmed. All EUS diagnoses were blindly reviewed by three pathologists to assess intra and interpersonal reproducibility. FNA-EUS diagnoses were: 10 inadequate (17%), 10 negative (17%), 4 suspicious (7%) and 33 positive (59%). Diagnoses of mediastinal and subdiaphragmatic masses were: relapse of lung carcinoma (3), mesenchimal tumor not otherwise specifiable (3), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (1), esophageal carcinoma (2) and paraganglioma (1). The sensitivity attained was 85% and the specificity 100%; revision of the slides demonstrated a significant diagnostic reproducibility of the three cytopathologists (P < 0.5). The sensitivity and specificity attained were similar to those reported in the literature suggesting that experienced cytopathologists and endoscopists from different institutions can employ the same procedure reaching comparable results. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2011;39:723-729.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES