𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Impact of comorbidity on lung cancer survival

✍ Scribed by C. Martin Tammemagi; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Michael Simoff; Paul Kvale


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
French
Weight
165 KB
Volume
103
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Lung cancer is associated with smoking and age, both of which are associated with comorbidity. We evaluated the impact of comorbidity on lung cancer survival. Data on 56 comorbidities were abstracted from the records of a cohort of 1,155 patients. Survival effects were evaluated with Cox regression (outcome crude death). The adjusted R^2^ statistic was used to compare the survival variation explained by predictive variables. No comorbidity was observed in 11.7% of patients, while 54.3% had 3 or more (mean 2.97) comorbidities. In multivariate analysis, 19 comorbidities were associated with survival: HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, previous metastatic cancer, thyroid/glandular diseases, electrolyte imbalance, anemia, other blood diseases, dementia, neurologic disease, congestive heart failure, COPD, asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, liver disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal disease, connective tissue disease, osteoporosis and peripheral vascular disease. Only the latter was protective. Some of the hazards of comorbidities were explained by more directly acting comorbidities and/or receipt of treatment. Stage explained 25.4% of the survival variation. In addition to stage, the 19 comorbidities explained 6.1%, treatments 9.2%, age 3.7% and histology 1.3%. Thirteen uncommon comorbidities (prevalence <6%) affected 21.2% of patients and explained 3.5% of the survival variation. Comorbidity count and the Charlson index were significant predictors but explained only 2.5% and 2.0% of the survival variation, respectively. Comorbidity has a major impact on survival in early‐ and late‐stage disease, and even infrequent deleterious comorbidities are important collectively. Comorbidity count and the Charlson index failed to capture much information. Clinical practice and trials need to consider the effect of comorbidity in lung cancer patients. Β© 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Impact of cancer therapy on survival
✍ E. H. Stonehill πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1978 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 365 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

Survival rates improved significantly for 28,036 lymphoma and leukemia patients studied between 1950 and 1973. Nine cancers reviewed demonstrated increased one, three and five year survival rates. Greatest improvement was acute lymphocytic leukemia survival. Least improvement was for chronic granulo

Impact of comorbidity on short-term mort
✍ Frank R. Datema; Marciano B. Ferrier; Marc P. van der Schroeff; Robert J. Baaten πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 178 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background In 2001, we presented a Cox regression model that is able to predict survival of the newly diagnosed patient with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This model is based on the TNM classification and other important clinical variables such as age at diagnosis,

Impact of comorbidity on the outcome of
✍ Vinidh Paleri; Richard G. Wight; Gareth R. Davies πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 99 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. Comorbidity has been shown to be a determinant in treatment selection and survival in various cancers. We have previously shown that the Adult Comorbidity Evaluationβ€”27 index is applicable in a United Kingdom setting, and the process of comorbidity grading by retrospecti