Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the profile of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients who receive abciximab versus eptifibatide, as well as to compare the effect of abciximab versus eptifibatide on hospital length of stay. Retrospective data were obtained from HCIA's Clinical Pathways Database on 5,446 coronary angioplasty patients who were administered either abciximab or eptifibatide. Estimation was conducted via a twoβstage sample selection model. In the first stage, a probit regression was employed to determine which factors were associated with a higher probability of being administered abciximab versus eptifibatide. In the second stage, a negative binomial model was used to estimate the impact of a wide range of factors (selection of GPIIb/IIIa, patient demographics, insurance provider, health conditions, admission information, and hospital characteristics) on total hospital length of stay, as well as on postprocedural length of stay. After controlling for highβrisk indications and other sources of selection bias, results indicate that receipt of abciximab was associated with a significantly shorter length of total hospital stay (0.83 fewer days; P < 0.001) than receipt of eptifibatide. Additionally, receipt of abciximab was found to be associated with a significantly shorter postprocedural hospital length of stay (0.48 fewer days; P = 0.002) compared to receipt of eptifibatide. Results of this study indicate that PCI patients who are administered abciximab versus eptifibatide have a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (both total and postprocedural). This finding is important since hospital length of stay reflects the occurrence of complications and has been found to be directly related to the resources consumed during inβpatient management of patients. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:296β303. Β© WileyβLiss, Inc.