𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Immunogenetic risk and protective factors for juvenile dermatomyositis in Caucasians

✍ Scribed by Gulnara Mamyrova; Terrance P. O'Hanlon; Jason B. Monroe; Danielle Mercatante Carrick; James D. Malley; Sharon Adams; Ann M. Reed; Ejaz A. Shamim; Laura James-Newton; Frederick W. Miller; Lisa G. Rider


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
83 KB
Volume
54
Category
Article
ISSN
0004-3591

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Objective

To define the relative importance (RI) of class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) alleles and peptide binding motifs as risk or protective factors for juvenile dermatomyositis (DM), and to compare these with HLA associations in adult DM.

Methods

DRB1 and DQA1 typing was performed in 142 Caucasian patients with juvenile DM, and the results were compared with HLA typing data from 193 patients with adult DM and 797 race‐matched controls. Random Forests classification and multiple logistic regression were used to assess the RI of the HLA associations.

Results

The HLA–DRB1*0301 allele was a primary risk factor (odds ratio [OR] 3.9), while DQA1*0301 (OR 2.8), DQA1*0501 (OR 2.1), and homozygosity for DQA1*0501 (OR 3.2) were additional risk factors for juvenile DM. These risk factors were not present in patients with adult DM without defined autoantibodies. DQA1 alleles *0201 (OR 0.37), *0101 (OR 0.38), and *0102 (OR 0.51) were identified as novel protective factors for juvenile DM, the latter 2 also being protective factors in adult DM. The peptide binding motif DRB1 ^9^EYSTS^13^ was a risk factor, and DQA1 motifs F^25^, S^26^, and ^45^(V/A)W(R/K)^47^ were protective. Random Forests classification analysis revealed that among the identified risk factors for juvenile DM, DRB1*0301 had a higher RI (100%) than DQA1*0301 (RI 57%), DQA1*0501 (RI 42%), or the peptide binding motifs. In a logistic regression model, DRB1*0301 and DQA1*0201 were the strongest risk and protective factors, respectively, for juvenile DM.

Conclusion

DRB1*0301 is ranked higher in RI than DQA1*0501 as a risk factor for juvenile DM. DQA1*0301 is a newly identified HLA risk factor for juvenile DM, while 3 of the DQA1 alleles studied are newly identified protective factors for juvenile DM.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Immunogenetic risk and protective factor
✍ Okada, Satoshi ;Kamb, Mary L. ;Pandey, Janardan P. ;Philen, Rossanne M. ;Love, L 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 81 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective To assess L‐tryptophan (LT) dose, age, sex, and immunogenetic markers as possible risk or protective factors for the development of LT‐associated eosinophilia–myalgia syndrome (EMS) and related clinical findings. ## Methods HLA–DRB1 and DQA1 allele typing and Gm/Km pheno

Development and evaluation of the McKnig
✍ Shisslak, Catherine M. ;Renger, Ralph ;Sharpe, Tamara ;Crago, Marjorie ;McKnight 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 144 KB 👁 2 views

## Objective: To describe the development, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the mcknight risk factor survey-iii (mrfs-iii). the mrfs-iii was designed to assess a number of potential risk and protective factors for the development of disordered eating in prea

Platelet-activating factor–acetylhydrola
✍ Anna Cederholm; Elisabet Svenungsson; Dominique Stengel; Guo-Zhong Fei; A. Graha 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 112 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective There is an important inflammatory component to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is therefore interesting that the risk of CVD is high in inflammatory diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In this study, we investigated nontraditional ris