𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Immediate results and dilatation effect of the vein-covered Palmaz-Schatz stent assessed by intravascular ultrasound

✍ Scribed by Muramatsu, Toshiya ;Tukahara, Reiko ;Hou, Mimi ;Ito, Shigeki ;Inoue, Takehiko


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
277 KB
Volume
44
Category
Article
ISSN
0098-6569

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


To evaluate the clinical results of stenting using the vein-covered Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Twenty-eight patients with angina pectoris or confirmed ischemia were entered into this study. Thirteen were allocated to the veincovered PS stent group and 15 to the normal Palmaz-Schatz stent group. The immediate clinical results in these groups and changes in lumen dimension as assessed by IVUS, were investigated. Acute success was 100% in both groups. There were no immediate complications. Subacute thrombosis occurred in one patient in the vein-covered PS group. In the vein-covered PS group, percent diameter stenosis of the involved coronary artery changed from 70.2% before stenting to 8.8% immediately after and 42.2% at 5 months follow-up. The respective values were 84.5%, 13.4%, and 36.5% in the normal Palmaz-Schatz group. Restenosis in the vein-covered group was 23.1% and in the Palmaz-Schatz group was 20%, showing no significant differences between the two groups. The luminal area in the vein-covered group as assessed by IVUS increased from 3.2 mm 2 to 7.4 mm 2 (pre to post) and from 3.2 mm 2 to 8.2 mm 2 in the normal Palmaz-Schatz group. The plaque area decreased from 13.6 mm 2 to 10 mm 2 (pre to post) in the vein-covered group and from 13.0 mm 2 to 9.2 mm 2 in the Palmaz-Schatz group. In this study, conducted in a limited number of cases, it is possible to use vein-covered stent like as usual Palmaz-Schatz stent. The vein-covered stent had less dilative effect compared with the Palmaz-Schatz stent. This was probably because of its increased profile but there was no difference in the occurrence of subacute thrombosis or in restenosis rate. Cathet.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES