𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Imagining fictitious childhood events: the role of individual differences in imagination inflation

✍ Scribed by Robert Horselenberg; Harald Merckelbach; Peter Muris; Eric Rassin; Madelon Sijsenaar; Victor Spaan


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
94 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
1063-3995

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Imagination inflation refers to the phenomenon that imagining a low probability childhood event promotes subjective confidence that the event actually happened. The present article describes two studies that addressed the issue of whether imagination inflation is related to certain personality characteristics (i.e. social desirability, imagery ability, and dissociation). In Study 1, students (N 34) rated the probability of 60 childhood events. Four weeks later, they came to the laboratory and were asked to imagine four low-probability childhood events. Next, new confidence ratings of target (i.e. imagined) and control items were collected. Students also completed measures of social desirability, imagery ability, and dissociation. While a higher percentage of increased confidence ratings was found for target items than for control items, the size of this imagination inflation effect was modest. Only imagery ability was found to be related to imagination inflation in that individuals with better imagery abilities displayed a larger imagination inflation effect. The procedure of Study 2 (N 45) closely followed that of Study 1, except that imagination of target items now had to be written down. Writing about a fictitious event generated a straightforward imagination inflation phenomenon, but this was not related to any of the personality characteristics. The discussion focuses on the extent to which imagination inflation may model therapy-induced false memories.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The role of perceptual elaboration and i
✍ Sarah B. Drivdahl; Maria S. Zaragoza 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 153 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract Witnesses who are exposed to false or misleading information in the course of an investigation are often asked follow‐up questions designed to elicit more detailed information about the alleged objects/events. The results of the present study showed that pressing witnesses to elaborate