Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient–echo MR imaging

✍ Scribed by Hiroshi Yoshioka; Marcus Alley; Daniel Steines; Kathryn Stevens; Erika Rubesova; Mark Genovese; Michael F. Dillingham; Philipp Lang

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2003
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 435 KB
• Volume: 18
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1053-1807
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10320

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Purpose

To compare three‐dimensional (3D) spatial‐spectral (SS) spoiled gradient‐recalled acquisition in the steady state (SPGR) imaging with fat‐suppressed 3D SPGR sequences in MR imaging of articular cartilage of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis.

Materials and Methods

MR images of six patients with osteoarthritis of the knee were prospectively examined with a 1.5T MR scanner. For quantitative analyses, the signal‐to‐noise ratios, contrast‐to‐noise ratios, and contrast of cartilage and adjacent structures including meniscus, synovial fluid, muscle, fat tissue, and bone marrow were measured.

Results

In patients with osteoarthritis, 3DSS‐SPGR images demonstrated higher spatial resolution and higher mean signal‐to‐noise (S/N) ratios (cartilage, 24.9; synovial fluid, 12.3; muscle, 20.7; meniscus, 21.6), with shorter acquisition times (7 minutes 20 seconds), when compared to fat‐suppressed 3D SPGR images (cartilage, 22.3; synovial fluid, 10.8; muscle, 16.7; meniscus, 13.4).

Conclusion

3DSS‐SPGR imaging is a promising method for evaluating cartilage pathology in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and has the potential to replace fat‐suppressed 3D SPGR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;18:66–71. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.