<p>What is it for a sentence to have a certain meaning? This is the question that the distinguished analytic philosopher William P. Alston addresses in this major contribution to the philosophy of language. His answer focuses on the given sentence's potential to play the role that its speaker had in
Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning
β Scribed by William P. Alston
- Publisher
- Cornell University Press
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 344
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
What is it for a sentence to have a certain meaning? This is the question that the distinguished analytic philosopher William P. Alston addresses in this major contribution to the philosophy of language. His answer focuses on the given sentence's potential to play the role that its speaker had in mind, what he terms the usability of the sentence to perform the illocutionary act intended by its speaker.
Alston defines an illocutionary act as an act of saying something with a certain "content." He develops his account of what it is to perform such acts in terms of taking responsibility, in uttering a sentence, for the existence of certain conditions. In requesting someone to open a window, for example, the speaker takes responsibility for its being the case that the window is closed and that the speaker has an interest in its being opened.
In Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning, Alston expands upon this concept, creating a framework of five categories of illocutionary act and going on to argue that sentence meaning is fundamentally a matter of illocutionary act potential; that is, for a sentence to have a particular meaning is for it to be usable to perform illocutionary acts of a certain type. In providing detailed and explicit patterns of analysis for the whole range of illocutionary acts, Alston makes a unique contribution to the field of philosophy of languageβone that is likely to generate debate for years to come.
β¦ Subjects
Criticism & Theory;History & Criticism;Literature & Fiction;Grammar;Words, Language & Grammar;Reference;Linguistics;Words, Language & Grammar;Reference;Semantics;Words, Language & Grammar;Reference;Analytic Philosophy;Philosophy;Politics & Social Sciences;Literary Theory;Literature;Humanities;New, Used & Rental Textbooks;Specialty Boutique;Philosophy;Aesthetics;Epistemology;Ethics;History & Surveys;Logic;Metaphysics;Humanities;New, Used & Rental Textbooks;Specialty Boutique;Linguistics;Humanitie
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The Philosophical Review, Vol. 77, No. 4 (Oct., 1968), 405-424. 20 pages.<div class="bb-sep"></div>ΠΠΈΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ.<div class="bb-sep"></div>In attempting to explore Austinβs notion of an illocutionary act I have found his corresponding notion of a locutionary act very unhelpful and have been for
<p>Falling over in the snow is an embarrassment Remy doesn't need—however, the help of a cheeky stranger is all that is required to make her feel better.<p>Remy can't help rising to the bait when Isaiah criticises her keep-fit method, leading to a battle of wills and fitness regimes. Despite h