𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Identity crises and strong compactness

✍ Scribed by Arthur W. Apter; James Cummings

Publisher
Springer
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
137 KB
Volume
40
Category
Article
ISSN
0933-5846

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

How large is the first strongly compact
How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or a study on identity crises
✍ Menachem Magidor 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 764 KB

It is proved that ff strongly compact cardinals ale consistent, then it is consistent that the fb~t such cardinal is the first measurable. On the othat hand, if it is consistent to asmlne the existence of supcrcompact cardinal, then it is consistent to assume that it is the t~trst strongly compact c

Universal partial indestructibility and
Universal partial indestructibility and strong compactness
✍ Arthur W. Apter 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 153 KB

## Abstract For any ordinal __δ__, let __λ~δ~__ be the least inaccessible cardinal above __δ__. We force and construct a model in which the least supercompact cardinal __κ__ is indestructible under __κ__‐directed closed forcing and in which every measurable cardinal __δ__ < __κ__ is < __λ~δ~__ stro

Characterizing strong compactness via st
Characterizing strong compactness via strongness
✍ Arthur W. Apter 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 176 KB

## Abstract We construct a model in which the strongly compact cardinals can be non‐trivially characterized via the statement “__κ__ is strongly compact iff __κ__ is a measurable limit of strong cardinals”. If our ground model contains large enough cardinals, there will be supercompact cardinals in

Level by level equivalence and strong co
Level by level equivalence and strong compactness
✍ Arthur W. Apter 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 219 KB

## Abstract We force and construct models in which there are non‐supercompact strongly compact cardinals which aren't measurable limits of strongly compact cardinals and in which level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness holds non‐trivially except at strongly compac