✦ LIBER ✦

Identifying Variables Responsible for Data not Missing at Random

✍ Scribed by Ke-Hai Yuan

Book ID: 106573933
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 394 KB
Volume: 74
Category: Article
ISSN: 0033-3123
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-008-9088-6

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Empirical likelihood method for quantile

Empirical likelihood method for quantiles with response data missing at random

✍ Xia-yan Li; Jun-qing Yuan 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Institute of Applied Mathematics, Chinese Academy 🌐 English ⚖ 212 KB

A general model for two-level data with

A general model for two-level data with responses missing at random

✍ Roderick P. McDonald 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 591 KB

Empirical Likelihood Confidence Interval

Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Response Mean with Data Missing at Random

✍ LIUGEN XUE 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 518 KB

Methods for the Analysis of Explanatory

Methods for the Analysis of Explanatory Linear Regression Models with Missing Data Not at Random

✍ José Blas Navarro Pastor 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB

Simple imputation methods were inadequat

Simple imputation methods were inadequate for missing not at random (MNAR) quality of life data

✍ Shona Fielding; Peter M Fayers; Alison McDonald; Gladys McPherson; Marion K Camp 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 535 KB

A test of missing completely at random f

A test of missing completely at random for longitudinal data with missing observations

✍ Taesung Park; Seung-Yeoun Lee 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 115 KB 👁 2 views

Liang and Zeger proposed a generalized estimating equations approach to the analysis of longitudinal data. Their models assume that missing observations are missing completely at random in the sense of Rubin. However, when this assumption does not hold, their analysis may yield biased results. In th