NMR offers, in the complex proton relaxation properties of biological tissues, a unique and potentially powerful tool of tissue characterization. The difficulties encountered so far in comparing the results of in vitro and in vivo NMR studies carried out in different laboratories inhibit NMR methodo
I. Introduction, objectives, and activities
✍ Scribed by F. Podo; J.S. Orr; W.M.M.J. Bovée; J.D. de Certaines; D. Leibfritz
- Book ID
- 103909709
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 846 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0730-725X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The multi-parameter dependence of magnetic resonance (MR) images allows a unique flexibility of soft tissue contrast and gives access to peculiar sources of in vivo tissue characterization, mainly associated with magnetic relaxation properties. However, MR methodologies have not yet expressed their full potential in terms of tissue characterization for several reasons: a) problems of quality control and quantitation have generally not been addressed by centers using MRI equipment, nor in most of the published literature; and b) data scattering of quantitative measurements obtained from tissues in vitro and in vivo appear to be a major factor in inhibiting or limiting the clinical utility of MRI, for a possible in vivo characterization of pathological tissues. An international project, aimed at evaluating the clinical significance of tissue characterization by MR, was activated in 1984 by the Biomedical Engineering Advisory Committee of the European Communities (EC COMAC-BME) within the 3rd EC Medical and Health Research Programme (MHRP). The scientific achievements of this first project (Magn. Reson. Imaging, 6:171-222; 1988) represented the basis for launching and performing a second Concerted Action, in the frame of the 4th MHRP (1988-1992). Main areas of research of this second project were: a) development of standard methodologies for quantitative measurements of MR parameters and correlation with histo- and physiopathology; b) performance assessment and calibration of MR clinical equipment; c) harmonization of test procedures with other centers and industry; and d) pilot multi-center collections of data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
By enabling noninvasive measurements of tissue biochemistry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides a unique means of characterizing tissues. Differences in equipment, techniques, and methodology between different laboratories cause major difficulties when comparing results, whether