Hypothesis Testing In Evolutionary Inference
โ Scribed by J.F.Y. Brookfield
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 142 KB
- Volume
- 185
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5193
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The comparative method, amongst other things, searches for correlations between evolutionary variables. These can be used to test null hypotheses. Here I consider, in the context of binary variables, the bases of such tests. I examine grounds upon which evolutionary traits and events can be regarded as statistically independent of each other. I argue that no description of observations as independent or non-independent makes sense except in the context of a population of possible observations from which they are regarded as having being sampled. Significant correlations between traits or changes in traits in comparative tests have been taken by some to imply causal links between traits. However, the statistical significance of an observed correlation between traits is neither necessary nor sufficient for the inference of a causal connection between them.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Friedman tests permit multiple intergroup comparisons. Other rank-order tests permit only single intergroup comparisons. Specific details to guide the researcher in the proper selection of these tests are presented.
The hypothesis was investigated that when trait inferences rejer to abstract behaviour labels (i.e. 'conceited') they act as a general interpretation frame and lead to assimilation in subsequent judgments of' an ambiguous target, whereas when they refer to specific actor-trait links (i.e. 'Peter is