𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Hydraulic conductivity of peat at Ellergower Moss, Scotland

✍ Scribed by R. S. Clymo


Book ID
102262550
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
169 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6087

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Falling head (and a few rising head) measurements were made of hydraulic conductivity k in a profile of a 7 m deep, small raised bog in southwest Scotland. The seven piezometer pipes were 39 mm diameter, and most of the measurements were made with attached tubes of 2Β·5 mm diameter, so that only 2–3 mm of water crossed the peat interface during a run. There were no consistent effects of pre‐flushing, direction of flow (falling, rising), or measuring‐tube size. Variability of 10–20% in k did not obscure an exponential decrease with depth from 5 Γ— 10^βˆ’6^ cm s^βˆ’1^ at 100 cm to 0Β·7 Γ— 10^βˆ’6^ cm s^βˆ’1^ at 500 cm. This decrease was uncorrelated with dry bulk density or peat stiffness, and only loosely so with a measure of humification. Calculated mean bulk velocity of pore water may be as low as 1 mm year^βˆ’1^. Pressure in the silty sand below the peat was 180 mbar less than expected, suggesting a thin highly impermeable layer (β€˜pan’?) at the peat base. The substratum may have hydrological connection with an adjacent lake. The hydraulic properties of this raised bog contrast strongly with those of a raised bog in Minnesota, and do not fit the assumptions made for Ingram's simple groundwater mound model of raised bog shape. Copyright Β© 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


FIELD ESTIMATION OF MACROPORE FUNCTIONIN
✍ ANDREW J. BAIRD πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 189 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

A limitation of existing models of water and solute movement in fen peats is that they fail to represent processes in the unsaturated zone. This limitation is largely due to a lack of data on the hydraulic properties of unsaturated peat, in particular the relationship between hydraulic conductivity

Evaluating the quality of hydraulic cond
✍ Ben W. J. Surridge; Dr Andrew J. Baird; A. L. Heathwaite πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 315 KB

## Abstract Although widely used in wetland hydrological studies, hydraulic conductivity (__K__) estimates from piezometer slug tests are often of questionable validity. Frequently, this is because insufficient attention is paid to the details of the test procedure. Further, in a potentially hetero

Anisotropy and depth-related heterogenei
✍ Clive W. Beckwith; Andrew J. Baird; A. Louise Heathwaite πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 285 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Anisotropy and heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity (K) are suspected of greatly affecting rates and patterns of ground-water seepage in peats. A new laboratory method, termed here the modified cube method, was used to measure horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity (K h and K v ) of 400 s

DISCUSSION: β€˜HYDROLOGICAL MODEL OF PEAT-
✍ BAIRD, ANDREW J.; GAFFNEY, SIMON W. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 227 KB

In this comment we argue that the premise on which the peat mound model developed by Armstrong (Earth Surface Process and Landforms, 1995,20,473-477) is based, that hydraulic conductivity shows an exponential decline with depth in bog peats, is unsound. Empirical evidence in the literature for such