Hydraulic conductivity of peat at Ellergower Moss, Scotland
β Scribed by R. S. Clymo
- Book ID
- 102262550
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 169 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6087
- DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.1374
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Falling head (and a few rising head) measurements were made of hydraulic conductivity k in a profile of a 7 m deep, small raised bog in southwest Scotland. The seven piezometer pipes were 39 mm diameter, and most of the measurements were made with attached tubes of 2Β·5 mm diameter, so that only 2β3 mm of water crossed the peat interface during a run. There were no consistent effects of preβflushing, direction of flow (falling, rising), or measuringβtube size. Variability of 10β20% in k did not obscure an exponential decrease with depth from 5 Γ 10^β6^ cm s^β1^ at 100 cm to 0Β·7 Γ 10^β6^ cm s^β1^ at 500 cm. This decrease was uncorrelated with dry bulk density or peat stiffness, and only loosely so with a measure of humification. Calculated mean bulk velocity of pore water may be as low as 1 mm year^β1^. Pressure in the silty sand below the peat was 180 mbar less than expected, suggesting a thin highly impermeable layer (βpanβ?) at the peat base. The substratum may have hydrological connection with an adjacent lake. The hydraulic properties of this raised bog contrast strongly with those of a raised bog in Minnesota, and do not fit the assumptions made for Ingram's simple groundwater mound model of raised bog shape. Copyright Β© 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A limitation of existing models of water and solute movement in fen peats is that they fail to represent processes in the unsaturated zone. This limitation is largely due to a lack of data on the hydraulic properties of unsaturated peat, in particular the relationship between hydraulic conductivity
## Abstract Although widely used in wetland hydrological studies, hydraulic conductivity (__K__) estimates from piezometer slug tests are often of questionable validity. Frequently, this is because insufficient attention is paid to the details of the test procedure. Further, in a potentially hetero
Anisotropy and heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity (K) are suspected of greatly affecting rates and patterns of ground-water seepage in peats. A new laboratory method, termed here the modified cube method, was used to measure horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity (K h and K v ) of 400 s
In this comment we argue that the premise on which the peat mound model developed by Armstrong (Earth Surface Process and Landforms, 1995,20,473-477) is based, that hydraulic conductivity shows an exponential decline with depth in bog peats, is unsound. Empirical evidence in the literature for such